 |
|
|
[N]
|
|
|
|
Dante
|
|
|
|
[N]
|
|

03-13-2007, 05:38 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dante
I read most of digital fortress then my brother went and lost the damn book...
|
:x
|
|
|
|
|
light
Banned
|
|

03-13-2007, 10:50 PM
i've read davinci code and angels and demons.
.... im not a big fan.... x___x;;;;
|
|
|
|
|
lostinXgrav
|
|
|
|
Victor Von Doom
n/a
|
|

03-15-2007, 05:18 PM
I read the Da Vinci code to see what all the hype was about and I can say that Dan Brown is one of the most inept writers I've ever read. The only part I genuinely enjoyed was the escape scene from the museum where Langdon tries to drive stick ... and only because I've never seen a protagonist in an action/thriller not know how to operate and manual transmission.
The plot itself was decent, but his dialogue was atrocious (the scene that sticks out is where Langdon is explaining Phi to his class. His repartee with his class is groan inducing: "'NO WAY!' a young woman shouted; 'WAY!', Langdon shot back." Ugh. And that wasn't the worst of it).
His descriptions were lazy beyond belief. I don't remember Sophie really being described at all. Langdon is described as "Harrison Ford in tweed" (hyuck, hyuck ... oh, wait, Dan Brown dresses like Langdon ... Mary Sue, anyone?) and Sir Teabing was described in as red-headed, short and pudgy. And what does Brown do to punctuate this description ... "He looked like as much of a knight as Elton John".
I said above that his plot and its conjectures were decent. They are. In capable hands, it might have been a far better book. In Brown's, it's a purile, self-servicing idea. Notice how both the intellectual "authorities" in the book, Langdon and Teabing, submit their "facts" to the reader's proxy character, Sophie, in a condescending manner. Basically, it's "Oh, you didn't know that. You must be dense." No one really questions the question or examine any facets of it. "Jesus got busy." "I don't believe you!" "Well, look at this painting." "Oh, okay."
It's an awkward, plodding book that I think most people enjoyed because it had a topic that was, in America, almost universally interesting and because it read like a Cliff's Notes version of itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Deniece
|
|
|
|
Super Pantless Girl
|
|
|
|
secretdae007
|
|
|
|
Aliena
|
|
|
|
Phareas
n/a
|
|
|
|
Seito
Event Coordinator
|
|

03-17-2007, 08:05 AM
*waves to [N]* Remember me? I'm Houkiboshi3133 from gaia, from the guild? Maybe not? I dunno, I don't think I make a last expression on people.
Have read all four books. *nods*
But really, the only ones I enjoyed were Angels and Demons and DaVinci Code.
Mainly because the other two took forever to get to the point. Both had good ideas, good plots, just took forever to get to the book.
I read DaVinci Code before I read Angels and Demons. How did I read it? Well I went to costco, went to the book section, and while my parents were shopping (which was like 45 mins every trip to costco) I was reading the book, now repeat until I finished it (took about four or five trips) xD
Reading the book, did raising some interesting questions. My aunty was a little horrified to find out that I was reading a book that attacked the church (while I may believe in God, I do not really put him first in my life. First in my life is merely surviving through each day. It's kinda like, hi god I know you're somewhere up there, but since I know you can't or wont' do much to like help me ace my classes and give me less stress and drama at school, I'm gonna kinda ignore you until I have more time to deal with you God.)
Whether it's all true or not, I don't know. It opens all sorta of doors. If it turns out true, then cool this guy just made history. If it hasn't, well then, it's a fiction book people, time to get a little grip on reality (though I should be the last person saying that. >.> *is last person to get grip on reality*)
Angels and Demons I enjoyed more because it had more action, more trying to solve a puzzle. *shrugs* There are parts of Dan Brown's books that I enjoy and parts that I hate.
|
|
|
|
|
Enniel
|
|
|
|
momus
|
|
|
|
Simplixity
|
|

03-24-2007, 08:34 PM
Heh, like everyone else, I've read The DeVinci Code. Personally, I don't see why people don't like it, I suppose it's just a matter of taste. I thought it was one of the best story plot ever written, and the movie missed out on half the good information in the book. Finished it within 10 or so hours, I thought that it was really addicting once you get into it. Also, it should be noted that the book was partially right -- Did anyone watch that Discovery Channel show on finding Jesus's tomb? I'm not going to discuss the religion controversy, but according the the discovery, Jesus was married to Mary and even had a son..
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) |
|
|