| Insomniac |
01-29-2010 09:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ms wolcott
(Post 1766291094)
Your experience is limited, very limited. You are therefore naive. Plus the whole 'socially acceptable' stilted language is a bit weird to me, as if you are over-qualifying your age preference. 29 year olds are just as nice in bed as 28 year olds, LOL.
|
Great, you know all the details of my sexual partners and you frequent any of the dungeons I may or may not be involved with. Glad to hear :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ms wolcott
(Post 1766291094)
HAHAHA let me laugh at the security clearance. I'VE held jobs that needed security clearance. That consisted of a thorough background check and some fingerprinting. Government employee don't cruise around for naughty pictures of prospective female employees. Not only is that retarded, but I imagine that it is illegal (not to mention SEXIST).
|
You dear have a very strange view on sexism. I was referring to females in this context, but clearly this refers to males as well. High levels of clearance are a little more thorough than you may think, and they do a very thorough search for sexual deviance. I'm sure your security clearance involved a polygraph, and I'm sure what ever you needed it for was for something of a high level of national security.
An interesting read for you.
http://www.odu.edu/ao/hrnrotc/Studen...orkingRisk.pdf
Quote:
I had a client who lost her security clearance after using an online chat room. She was seeking advice on how to beat a computer game while attending a gaming convention. The "gaming" experts she chatted with online were foreign intelligence agents working out of China.
|
|
