Menewsha Avatar Community

Menewsha Avatar Community (https://www.menewsha.com/forum/index.php)
-   Extended Discussion (https://www.menewsha.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=111)
-   -   The Intolerance of Intolerance (https://www.menewsha.com/forum/showthread.php?t=144825)

Shtona 12-24-2009 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philomel (Post 1765866802)
Here's the thing, Draciolus: No one, ever, is telling you that you can't celebrate Christmas. You can sing your Christmas carols, you can have your Christmas trees, you can wish people a Merry Christmas. You can do basically whatever you want, just like everyone else.

But that's not what you Christians want. You want government-funded Nativity scenes in the middle of town. You want expensive, obnoxious giant freaking Christmas trees in the middle of the mall. You want everything saying 'Merry Christmas' from late October to early January. You want to wish people a Merry Christmas and then, if they happen to wish you a happy Chanukkah or Kwanzaa or Yule or whatever back, you create a major scene and then go tell your church group about how someone tried to test your faith. You get all up in arms if you see a giant menorah beside or in place of your precious tree, and talk about how the government shouldn't be allowing such an overt religious symbol in public, and how having to walk your children by it is nigh-persecution.

In short, not allowing you to completely control the Winter season religiously or completely squash other religions is not intolerance. You're worth no more than I am, your religion is worth no more than mine is, and just because your winter holiday is more commercialized than most, does not mean that it is all-important.

Wow! Rant much?

I'm a devout Atheist, and I agree with him. This sudden wave of 'political correctness' that has spread throughout our (meaning the U.S.'s) society is becoming ridiculous, and the near ban of the words "Merry Christmas" during this time of year is a very good example of it.

Also, your obvious distaste for Christians drove your entire post, and honestly, it was uncalled for. He'd already said he wasn't religious...very intolerant behavior indeed.

Philomel 12-24-2009 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shtona (Post 1765887338)
[Wow! Rant much?

Wow! Read the part of his post that admits than his was a rant much? My god, Shtona, you really just aren't even trying anymore.

Quote:

I'm a devout Atheist, and I agree with him. This sudden wave of 'political correctness' that has spread throughout our (meaning the U.S.'s) society is becoming ridiculous, and the near ban of the words "Merry Christmas" during this time of year is a very good example of it.
Kindly tell everyone in my area about this "near ban" on Christmas, please. Because for the last month, every local business has put out at least one commerical making a point of saying Merry Christmas, to the exclusion of every other celebration. Every year, my local news station has a series of commercials where the newscasters and their families wish everyone a happy holiday season, and this year, every single one has spent the entire freaking time talking about "It might not be politically correct, but MERRY CHRISTMAS", a few even throwing in that whole "Jesus is the reason for the season" bit. It's getting pretty fucking annoying, for apparently not being allowed.

As for the "political correctness" bit, I don't see why it's a bad thing. Blowing off a large chunk of the country just to make a point is douchebaggy behaviour. And if you're going to be like that, expect to be called out on it. Don't act like we're the ones with the problem.

Quote:

Also, your obvious distaste for Christians drove your entire post, and honestly, it was uncalled for. He'd already said he wasn't religious...very intolerant behavior indeed.
Completely unfounded opinion. But then, you've admitted in the past that you need absolutely no evidence to support your judgements of people, so I'm not really that surprised.

In no way do I have a "distaste" for Christians. I don't care for their religion, but I have nothing against them. In fact, not so long ago in this very thread if I'm not mistaken, I made a point of defending them, saying that most of the more devout ones I've met have been some of the nicest people I've ever known. I'm just sick of them getting all butthurt because they're losing the iron grip they've had on this country's media since its founding and then complaining that they're being oppressed and persecuted. And I get it. They went pretty much directly from lion food to ruling one of the most successful empires that has ever existed, so they haven't had to learn how to play nice with others. To them, it's either be totally in charge, or be persecuted. But in our relatively civil world, they need to get over that mentality if they plan on existing for much longer.

And yes, I'm aware he said he wasn't religious. However, he also referred to Christmas as HIS holiday, something he still hasn't explained. If he isn't Christian, Christmas is no more his holiday than Kwanzaa is mine.

Keyori 12-24-2009 11:26 PM

Philomel, I thought you were better than to try to claim a holiday that was completely fabricated by one black supremacist! ;P

Shtona 12-29-2009 10:49 PM

Quote:

In no way do I have a "distaste" for Christians. I don't care for their religion, but I have nothing against them. In fact, not so long ago in this very thread if I'm not mistaken, I made a point of defending them, saying that most of the more devout ones I've met have been some of the nicest people I've ever known. I'm just sick of them getting all butthurt because they're losing the iron grip they've had on this country's media since its founding and then complaining that they're being oppressed and persecuted. And I get it. They went pretty much directly from lion food to ruling one of the most successful empires that has ever existed, so they haven't had to learn how to play nice with others. To them, it's either be totally in charge, or be persecuted. But in our relatively civil world, they need to get over that mentality if they plan on existing for much longer.
...and yet you continue to speak of 'them' rather than their religion.

Oh, how your fingers betray your words...haha

Merry Christmas, btw. I forgot to tell everyone before the holiday, so I'm making up for it now...

Tutela de Xaoc 12-29-2009 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shtona (Post 1766004650)
...and yet you continue to speak of 'them' rather than their religion.

Oh, how your fingers betray your words...haha

How exactly do her fingers betray her words? Do not the fingers type the letters on the keyboard that become the words in the first place?

Kris 12-29-2009 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shtona (Post 1765887338)


Wow! Rant much?

I'm a devout Atheist, and I agree with him. This sudden wave of 'political correctness' that has spread throughout our (meaning the U.S.'s) society is becoming ridiculous, and the near ban of the words "Merry Christmas" during this time of year is a very good example of it.

Also, your obvious distaste for Christians drove your entire post, and honestly, it was uncalled for. He'd already said he wasn't religious...very intolerant behavior indeed.

No one is banning the words "merry Christmas". Not one person. If a business wants to say "Happy Holidays" instead, because they want to cater a wide range of people, then that is the business's choice. If the government decides to go for a happy medium between the secular and religious groups and say "happy holidays", then good on them. There are a lot of people who don't celebrate Christmas. But, I guarantee you that you can say "Merry Christmas" if you want, and I guarantee you that any business and any church can wish someone a good Christmas or put up nativity scenes if they wish.

Philomel 12-29-2009 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shtona (Post 1766004650)


...and yet you continue to speak of 'them' rather than their religion.

Oh, how your fingers betray your words...haha

Merry Christmas, btw. I forgot to tell everyone before the holiday, so I'm making up for it now...

Yes, because they are the ones doing things. "Christianity" is a label applied to a group. Labels aren't entities and cannot do things. Any things. If I were talking about something positive, I would still be saying "Christians". If I were talking about a group other than Christians, I would still be using the label that applies to the individuals belonging to that group, not just a description of what they have in common.

I do so love how you try to distract people from the fact that you have no real point or factual basis for any of your opinions by attempting to pick apart my grammar. And failing, no less! Please tell me it didn't take you five whole days to think up that response.

Shtona 12-29-2009 11:26 PM

@Tutela: Bad wording, that's all...I figured such intelligent people as yourselves would be able to figure out what I meant.

@Kris: I did say "near ban..." never that it was actually banned. It's more frowned upon. Like saying "black" rather than "African American." Or "indian" rather than "Native American."

and finally, @Phil: You should still probably learn to clarify (as I've learned to do) if only to keep people (like you and me) from nitpicking over your post. And no, it took me all of five seconds. I take breaks from debating to keep myself from getting too analytical in the real world. It's really annoying to everyone around me, and honestly, I don't blame them, it is annoying as hell...

Philomel 12-29-2009 11:40 PM

I did clarify. No one but you had a problem understanding what I said. That means the problem's with the reader, not the author.

And please, do not insult my intelligence. You're a notorious well-poisoner. It's just what you do. We've fought too often for me to not recognize an attempt to turn lurkers against me based on a misrepresentation of my opinion as exactly that.

Tutela de Xaoc 12-29-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shtona (Post 1766005441)
@Tutela: Bad wording, that's all...I figured such intelligent people as yourselves would be able to figure out what I meant.

I figured if you could try and pick on Philomel's way of wording things that I could as well ^^. Just making a point was all.

Shtona 12-29-2009 11:53 PM

As was I Tutela. As was I...sadly, it seems to have been missed.

Clarise 12-31-2009 03:48 AM

I was just thinking about this in another thread on another site, so I thought I'd add my 2 cents.

I definately agree. Letting people think what they want to think needs to be a part of the "live and let live" attitude. You can't force someone to accept a religion that they genuinely believe is wrong or a lifestyle choice that they don't approve of. You can't make people like things that they don't like.

Why should everyone have to accept everything. Why can't I just say, "I really don't like what you're doing, but I recognize that you are a human being just like me, and we can go with that. I still think you are wrong for XYZ, but that's okay." It's really not possible to make someone change their views by saying "Here I am, get used to it!" We all recognize that it's your life and you can do what you want with it. Just don't turn me into the villian because I don't like it.

Sorry, you can hate me now for not approving of everyone.

LilMissMollyPutz 12-31-2009 06:33 PM

hey what's being talked about now this is wierd.

Sizzla 12-31-2009 07:35 PM

Molly, please try to post on-topic in the debate threads please. :yes: Your post could be considered spam, so I'm just giving you a heads-up. Thank you!


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 AM.