Alright, then, why did you bring it up?
If you go to European history, you're going to learn about white people. If you go to American history, you're going to learn about Native Americans, and then whit people, because Europeans settled here before any other immigrant race. If you go to African history, you'll learn about black people. If you go to Indian history, you'll learn about Indian people. If you go to Japanese history, you'll learn about Asian people. Do you get my point or do I need to go on?

I am all for equality. I am an equal opportunity offender. But in that I somehow get called racist.... Meh Humanity just sucks in general. Lets abolish all ethnic history whatevers and make "The great achievements of the rainbow of humanity." and "The great failures of the rainbow of humanity." Since whites have a large chunk of history dedicated to them in each half that sound fair.

It's because our government is so busy sucking up to "minorities" that we aren't allowed to have a white anything.

I don't think we need a white history month, or a black history month. In school they do teach about Martin Luther King, Malcom X, about the slaves, the stories, the protests... They do that already in history class and sometimes in english class too. If we have black history month, then we should also have Native American history month. The Europeans did steal their land, and we don't get to learn barely anything about them. Everyone thinks they were red faced, had long hair, wore feathers(which some did, but not all of them..), and shot arrows. *is part native american so maybe that's why I think that...*, We should also then have Asian history month too. Since America did put them in camps for a little while, during the red scare. Also German history month. Same reason as before, they could be communist. I think we should be taught history from every cultures not just are own. Throw out the whole race month thing. It's pointless. In black history motnh, we learn about things we were already taught in history and english class(If you had to write a biography and do a report like my middle school class had to do. We also read a story by malcom X)There is no point in it anymore. I do find it unfair, because it excludes other races that have been mistreated.

White people are afraid of being racist because everything we say turns into a racial issue with other races who are, in fact, far more racist than us.

And aside from colleges, how many high and middle schools offer anything but American History, and a General History class that after the fall of Roman spefically focuses on the Western section of Europe till about 1912 give or take to the Russian revolution and then to WW1. Which again is mostly soul focus on White History.

With the begining part of American history, at least as I remember it and looking at younger family's text book, has little focus on the Natives of this Country and mostly goes from Columbus on.

History we learn is white History till after grades K-12. Where in college you could learn as you please. If not, find me a text book and the amount of high and middle schools classes out there available to teach anything but white history.

As interesting as this is and as (somewhat funny) as it sounds I agree...there is a 'black history month' so why not a white history month...we've done some awesome things in our day. :)

Well, I can see where you're coming from by asking for a White History Month, though I have to disagree with lumping all white folks into one month. I'm white, yes, but you ask me about it, I'll tell you that I'm half-Polish Jew, half-Texan hillbilly, with an Irish last name. And those are three different parts of my heritage, which ought to be celebrated seperately.