Menewsha Avatar Community

Menewsha Avatar Community (https://www.menewsha.com/forum/index.php)
-   Extended Discussion (https://www.menewsha.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=111)
-   -   Debate: Gay Marriage (https://www.menewsha.com/forum/showthread.php?t=72231)

Rmarques 11-06-2007 11:23 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
Quote:

Originally Posted by jediobiwan
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
I am also against gay marriage.
Marriage is a holy union of the opposite sex.
The Bible DOES say that homosexuality is wrong
If you don't believe me pick it up and read anything in Leviticus or even the new testament.
If a gay couple wants to be together, let them have a civil union.
That way it can be validated through the federal government, not the Church who opposses it with every fiber in their being.


OK, well, if you are going to use Leviticus, so am I.
Just curious, how many people do you know of that don't shave facial hair? Because if anyone shaves, they are going against Leviticus. Shellfish, like shrimp and mussels? Yep, against Leviticus. Polyester, or anything made from blended fibers? Unclean!!! If you are going to take one verse from Leviticus, you better take them all. And I don't know about you, but I like most of my t-shirts. Even the ones that aren't 100% cotton.

Isn't it Leviticus that also says that i can own a Hebrew slave for no more than 7 years and can beat him within an inch of his life as long as i don't kill him? Where's the nearest Slave vender in Georgia? :roll:

Unfortumently, you can only own foreign slaves.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible
"Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property." (Leviticus 25:44-45)

But let us not forget this lovely passage:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible
"For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him." (Leviticus 20:9)

Or this passage about agriculture and landscaping:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible
"...do not plant your field with two kinds of seed." (Leviticus 19:19)


Spatterdash 11-07-2007 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Actually, I can't see what the big deal is with having a civil union rather than a marriage. It confers all the legal benefits and gets around the church's problems. Nice and simple. It's the same thing in all but name.

Actually, the way things are right now, civil unions don't grant the same rights as marriage, and may not be recognised on other states. So, yeah, marriage is a better option.


Difference between marriage and Civil Unions 1

Difference between marriage and Civil Unions 2

Well, that might the case in the US, which I'll admit I'm not so up on, but they're pretty much exactly the same as a marriage in the UK. Though I believe you're prohibited from including religious content in your ceremony.

Rmarques 11-07-2007 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Actually, I can't see what the big deal is with having a civil union rather than a marriage. It confers all the legal benefits and gets around the church's problems. Nice and simple. It's the same thing in all but name.

Actually, the way things are right now, civil unions don't grant the same rights as marriage, and may not be recognised on other states. So, yeah, marriage is a better option.


Difference between marriage and Civil Unions 1

Difference between marriage and Civil Unions 2

Well, that might the case in the US, which I'll admit I'm not so up on, but they're pretty much exactly the same as a marriage in the UK. Though I believe you're prohibited from including religious content in your ceremony.

Ahh, I see. yeah, I'm mostly used to debate with Americans, even though I'm not american, so most of my sources are for American stuff... And yeah, the UK can't give gay couples more than a civil union, since you're officially a christian nation and all...

Spatterdash 11-07-2007 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Actually, I can't see what the big deal is with having a civil union rather than a marriage. It confers all the legal benefits and gets around the church's problems. Nice and simple. It's the same thing in all but name.

Actually, the way things are right now, civil unions don't grant the same rights as marriage, and may not be recognised on other states. So, yeah, marriage is a better option.


Difference between marriage and Civil Unions 1

Difference between marriage and Civil Unions 2

Well, that might the case in the US, which I'll admit I'm not so up on, but they're pretty much exactly the same as a marriage in the UK. Though I believe you're prohibited from including religious content in your ceremony.

Ahh, I see. yeah, I'm mostly used to debate with Americans, even though I'm not american, so most of my sources are for American stuff... And yeah, the UK can't give gay couples more than a civil union, since you're officially a christian nation and all...

Actually, I hadn't thought of that aspect. We do have a state church, but I don't think that that would necessarily influence policy - we're a very secular country, even if we don't have separation of church and state in law.
I think the civil partnership thing was just getting around the religious connotations of marriage, because it does convey the same legal benefits here as a marriage. It's just the version for homosexuals.

...Now I need to look up the difference between marriage and civil union in America, I think.

Admonish Misconstruction 11-07-2007 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Regarding religion: Jesus never said a word about homosexuality, but he spoke out on several occasions against adultery and divorce.
Yet you don't see the religious right out on the streets clamouring for the banning of divorce or the criminalisation of affairs, do you? Even though the adultery rule is right there in the Ten Commandments!
It's just a blatant example of faith being used as a front for prejudice.



(Sorry that I keep on picking on you Spatter! Its just that your right, but wrong.)

Jesus came to show us the w
ay. The way to God, to prove Gods existence, and even more die for our sins. His apostles, who he trained, and the holy spirit worked through from dreams, and revelations put down the laws for eternity. Meaning if you want to say you have had a new revelation, that goes against the Bible tough luck. Your wrong, because God said that my word is truth and that it is not bendable. You are not supposed to go against the Bible, so many times it says so (I don't want to post them all...) Jesus didn't go over many issues that pop into the Bible.

Some quotes from the Bible. Old and New testament.


Quote:

And the LORD God said, “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.” 19 Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So Adam gave names to all cattle, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper comparable to him.
21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. 22 Then the rib which the LORD God had taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man.
23 And Adam said:
“This is now bone of my bones
And flesh of my flesh;
She shall be called Woman,
Because she was taken out of Man.”

24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.
25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

Genesis 2:18-25
Quote:

Leviticus 18:22

22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.
Quote:

Romans 1:26-27

For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
Quote:

1 Corinthians 6:9-10

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[a] nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
Quote:

1 Timothy 1:9-10

knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.
[/quote]

ToxicQuiddity 11-07-2007 05:21 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi

Don't know if you'd noticed that THE FIRST AMMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION SAYS: "CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION"

Don't want them to marry in the church? No one was asking you to allow it. Millions of people marry through the courts who aren't christian. So, i'm sorry, but you fail.


Read, dumbass
I said marriage is a HOLY union between a male and female
HOLY
HOLY
Do you get it yet?
Who said they can't be married through the courts?
Not I, I just sad the church should decide.
You fail.

ToxicQuiddity 11-07-2007 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spatterdash
Actually, I can't see what the big deal is with having a civil union rather than a marriage. It confers all the legal benefits and gets around the church's problems. Nice and simple. It's the same thing in all but name.

Exactly.
Why should it have to impose itself into something that doesn't want it?

Admonish Misconstruction 11-07-2007 06:42 PM

Quote:

OK, well, if you are going to use Leviticus, so am I.
Just curious, how many people do you know of that don't shave facial hair? Because if anyone shaves, they are going against Leviticus. Shellfish, like shrimp and mussels? Yep, against Leviticus. Polyester, or anything made from blended fibers? Unclean!!! If you are going to take one verse from Leviticus, you better take them all. And I don't know about you, but I like most of my t-shirts. Even the ones that aren't 100% cotton.
Wrong.

Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.

Leviticus 19:27

You mean that quote from Leviticus? This is for priest, if you read the rest of Leviticus you will realize it is for priests. Priests performed sacrifices and they needed to be 'clean' and be good. When somebody messed up really bad they would shave their head and beard to show that they where clean once more. If you have long hair and beard it meant that you are not perfect obviously, but a good priest who tried his best to obey God's laws. Thus a man who could see over the temples sacrifices.

This also showed that you keep God's law, and that you are a good man trying to do his best. For anybody if you messed up you would shave totally to clean yourself, because before this God hadn't sent Jesus to die for own sins. Because Jesus had not come people grew their beard long, show respect to God, and to show themselves a 'good man' to help others to become better people. More God like, which by the way, striving to be good like God is something you are supposed to do. Calling yourself God, or more holy is not.

Once Jesus came to die for our sins we no longer have to do those things. Because we are saved from our sins by repenting to God and Jesus Christ because he died for us. Being the ultimate eternal sacrifice. No longer need to shave your beards now do you ^^.



Quote:

Don't know if you'd noticed that THE FIRST AMMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION SAYS: "CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION"
Thats only the first part.

Quote:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Please read it all the way through. Also they are talking about Congress. Think about it ^^.


Spatterdash 11-07-2007 06:49 PM

For the time being, admonished, I'll take your word for it, since you're obviously more familiar with scripture than I am.
Though I still feel that it's a bit unfair that the church is always going after the homosexuals when the adulterers, idolaters or the covetous are known to be just as bad.

Also, I notice all the quotes you provide mention only the sinfulness of men with men. Do we have any Biblical injunctions against lesbianism?

Admonish Misconstruction 11-07-2007 07:01 PM

Spatter: Hey at least my priest isn't going out on you XD. Its a painful experience.

You are exactly right. I'm agreeing with you Spatter, the Church should be going after everybody! Theres a small problem though, the Gay thing is quite a big issue. I wish the Church could go after everything at once, but sadly it can't. A little bit at a time. Though we do have a problem, we rarely even talk about the others, idolaters, and adulterers. I haven't heard much about it in other church's really. I think they should be addressed in sermons, and put down as evil. So yeah we are pretty much pushing those aside, and we shouldn't be.

Quote:

For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
Women exchange the natural use for what is against nature. Thats women and women, going against how sex should be in God's view.

Also in Corinthians 6:9-10 there was a different word used. Instead of homosexual which is a bad translation into English. I forgot how exactly it should be, yet I know a man who studies religious texts in Hebrew and it means something more like the opposite sex sleeping together. I wish I knew the Hebrew word, if so I could simply translate it.

Rmarques 11-07-2007 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by admonished nonsense


Also in Corinthians 6:9-10 there was a different word used. Instead of homosexual which is a bad translation into English. I forgot how exactly it should be, yet I know a man who studies religious texts in Hebrew and it means something more like the opposite sex sleeping together. I wish I knew the Hebrew word, if so I could simply translate it.

The word would probably be arsenokoitai, which so far has no definite translation. At most, they got something along the lines of "man bed", which could be seen as male prostitution that was available at certain pagan temples.

Also, being in the new testament, Corinthians was written in Acient Greek, not Hebrew. That's the old testament.

Source

Kyoko Otonashi 11-08-2007 01:52 AM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi

Don't know if you'd noticed that THE FIRST AMMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION SAYS: "CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION"

Don't want them to marry in the church? No one was asking you to allow it. Millions of people marry through the courts who aren't christian. So, i'm sorry, but you fail.


Read, dumbass
I said marriage is a HOLY union between a male and female
HOLY
HOLY
Do you get it yet?
Who said they can't be married through the courts?
Not I, I just sad the church should decide.
You fail.

I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you

Admonish Misconstruction 11-08-2007 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by admonished nonsense


Also in Corinthians 6:9-10 there was a different word used. Instead of homosexual which is a bad translation into English. I forgot how exactly it should be, yet I know a man who studies religious texts in Hebrew and it means something more like the opposite sex sleeping together. I wish I knew the Hebrew word, if so I could simply translate it.

The word would probably be arsenokoitai, which so far has no definite translation. At most, they got something along the lines of "man bed", which could be seen as male prostitution that was available at certain pagan temples.

Also, being in the new testament, Corinthians was written in Acient Greek, not Hebrew. That's the old testament.

Source

Oops, my bad XD. Arsenokoitai doesn't mean just man, but the same sex. I remember a long discussion I participated, where it came up.

Thanks for reminding me though. I had totally forgotten the word.

Rmarques 11-08-2007 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by admonished nonsense
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by admonished nonsense


Also in Corinthians 6:9-10 there was a different word used. Instead of homosexual which is a bad translation into English. I forgot how exactly it should be, yet I know a man who studies religious texts in Hebrew and it means something more like the opposite sex sleeping together. I wish I knew the Hebrew word, if so I could simply translate it.

The word would probably be arsenokoitai, which so far has no definite translation. At most, they got something along the lines of "man bed", which could be seen as male prostitution that was available at certain pagan temples.

Also, being in the new testament, Corinthians was written in Acient Greek, not Hebrew. That's the old testament.

Source

Oops, my bad XD. Arsenokoitai doesn't mean just man, but the same sex. I remember a long discussion I participated, where it came up.

Thanks for reminding me though. I had totally forgotten the word.

We do not know what the word means. The word was probably made up when the verse was written. At most we can speculate about it's meaning. Besides, the same sex what? The only other word that has translation issues, is Malakoi, which means soft, efeminate. Both words are right next to eachother. So... The same sex effeminate? What the hell does that even means?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you

Yep, you're absolutely right. Quite honestly, the whole think just reeks witch hunting and hipocrisy. What, with the Christian right going after the homosexuals and atheists, and making statements against political correctness, while at the same time having hissyfits everytime a criticism to christians or Christianity is made.

Kyoko Otonashi 11-08-2007 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by admonished nonsense
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by admonished nonsense


Also in Corinthians 6:9-10 there was a different word used. Instead of homosexual which is a bad translation into English. I forgot how exactly it should be, yet I know a man who studies religious texts in Hebrew and it means something more like the opposite sex sleeping together. I wish I knew the Hebrew word, if so I could simply translate it.

The word would probably be arsenokoitai, which so far has no definite translation. At most, they got something along the lines of "man bed", which could be seen as male prostitution that was available at certain pagan temples.

Also, being in the new testament, Corinthians was written in Acient Greek, not Hebrew. That's the old testament.

Source

Oops, my bad XD. Arsenokoitai doesn't mean just man, but the same sex. I remember a long discussion I participated, where it came up.

Thanks for reminding me though. I had totally forgotten the word.

We do not know what the word means. The word was probably made up when the verse was written. At most we can speculate about it's meaning. Besides, the same sex what? The only other word that has translation issues, is Malakoi, which means soft, efeminate. Both words are right next to eachother. So... The same sex effeminate? What the hell does that even means?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you

Yep, you're absolutely right. Quite honestly, the whole think just reeks witch hunting and hipocrisy. What, with the Christian right going after the homosexuals and atheists, and making statements against political correctness, while at the same time having hissyfits everytime a criticism to christians or Christianity is made.

Oh agreed. the woman i work with annoys me so much. She's always preaching, "Follow the bible. Follow God. If not you're going to hell. Homosexuals should be executed because it is the worst thing you could do! It's revolting." For a woman who is so gung ho on the bible, i wonder if she fails to see the 6 men who aren't her husband that she has had affairs with in the past year. hmmm.

ToxicQuiddity 11-08-2007 03:06 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you


Aren't you just the little hipocritical one.

The Bible states that a union between a man and a woman that do not believe in God is unholy, and that it isn't blessed before God
That's what most churches meet with the couple beforehand so that their marriage can be blessed.

And yes, athiest do get married
But not through the Church, which is what gay couples are wanting.

SexualPlacebo 11-08-2007 03:12 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you


Aren't you just the little hipocritical one.

The Bible states that a union between a man and a woman that do not believe in God is unholy, and that it isn't blessed before God
That's what most churches meet with the couple beforehand so that their marriage can be blessed.

And yes, athiest do get married
But not through the Church, which is what gay couples are wanting.

Um, athiests do get married through the church.
:/ Atleast, some do.

Kyoko Otonashi 11-08-2007 03:16 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you


Aren't you just the little hipocritical one.

The Bible states that a union between a man and a woman that do not believe in God is unholy, and that it isn't blessed before God
That's what most churches meet with the couple beforehand so that their marriage can be blessed.

And yes, athiest do get married
But not through the Church, which is what gay couples are wanting.

...i know exactly what marriage means within church guidelines. I'm not a hypocrite, i've stood by what i said the whole time, and this debate is not about marriage in the church. Marriage is not *just* a holy union. The Christians it is. Christians may believe that non-christians getting married is unholy. Good for them. No one cares. That's not what this debate is.

Gay couples aren't wanting to marry through the church. They are wanting to get married through the court system, which is what is illegal, because our president can't figure out the difference between religious law and state law. Why do gay couples want to get married? It has NOTHING to do with Christianity so don't flatter yourself (i'm sure there's a select few that do, but that's not what this debate is about. It's about marriage, period.) They want to marry because marriage grants couples over 3,000 rights such a both having custody over their adopted (or non adopted, depending if one actually had the child) child so that if something happens to one parent, the other parent can care for the child rather than having the child become an *orphan*. Also, if one needs serious medical decisions made but is incapacitated, their partner cannot help make a decision unless they're married. There's also thousands of tax benefits and other reasons that are completely unfair to withhold from gay couples just because they're gay. THAT is what this debate is about.

So please take a look at what we're actually talking about here, and look up marriage law and you will realize why preventing gay couples from marrying is complete and utter descrimination and nothing else.

kthx

Rmarques 11-08-2007 03:17 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you


Aren't you just the little hipocritical one.

The Bible states that a union between a man and a woman that do not believe in God is unholy, and that it isn't blessed before God
That's what most churches meet with the couple beforehand so that their marriage can be blessed.

And yes, athiest do get married
But not through the Church, which is what gay couples are wanting.

... I lol'd. Really, I did.

Sweety, that is not what we want. You can keep your marriage cerimonies at the church all you want.

What we want is the LEGAL marriage, which is beig denied to us. And yes, that is marriage, just like your cerimony. Calling it something different is nothing short of stupid.

Kyoko Otonashi 11-08-2007 03:21 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you


Aren't you just the little hipocritical one.

The Bible states that a union between a man and a woman that do not believe in God is unholy, and that it isn't blessed before God
That's what most churches meet with the couple beforehand so that their marriage can be blessed.

And yes, athiest do get married
But not through the Church, which is what gay couples are wanting.

... I lol'd. Really, I did.

Sweety, that is not what we want. You can keep your marriage cerimonies at the church all you want.

What we want is the LEGAL marriage, which is beig denied to us. And yes, that is marriage, just like your cerimony. Calling it something different is nothing short of stupid.

calling it a civil union, as some have suggested, just leaves it open for denying adoption rights and other rights that you are supposed to get. :(

I'm bisexual, but pretty much just straight. I like women and all but i'm planning on marrying the man i'm with. And i wish so bad that we get a president that takes the stick out of their ass and grants marriage to gays :(.

ToxicQuiddity 11-08-2007 03:24 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
...i know exactly what marriage means within church guidelines. I'm not a hypocrite, i've stood by what i said the whole time, and this debate is not about marriage in the church. Marriage is not *just* a holy union. The Christians it is. Christians may believe that non-christians getting married is unholy. Good for them. No one cares. That's not what this debate is.

Gay couples aren't wanting to marry through the church. They are wanting to get married through the court system, which is what is illegal, because our president can't figure out the difference between religious law and state law. Why do gay couples want to get married? It has NOTHING to do with Christianity so don't flatter yourself (i'm sure there's a select few that do, but that's not what this debate is about. It's about marriage, period.) They want to marry because marriage grants couples over 3,000 rights such a both having custody over their adopted (or non adopted, depending if one actually had the child) child so that if something happens to one parent, the other parent can care for the child rather than having the child become an *orphan*. Also, if one needs serious medical decisions made but is incapacitated, their partner cannot help make a decision unless they're married. There's also thousands of tax benefits and other reasons that are completely unfair to withhold from gay couples just because they're gay. THAT is what this debate is about.

kthx

I called you a hipocrit because you pointed the finger at me saying I was attacking you simply because I do not agree with you.
Wrong, that's what you did to me the second you posted your first reply.

Marriage is *just* a holy union, just because our federal government commands the separation of church and state which led to the deterioration of the western religion, doesn't mean that the intentions of marriage have become any less holy.

Just because a few gays you have talked to denied that they wanted it throgh the church, doesn't mean all of them.
I have spoken to many, many gays and they each have their own opinion.
Unfortunately they have been enraged that the church doesn't accept their union and write it off as legit, but that's the churches decision not theirs
They shouldn't be allowed to change ancient rules to fit their modern wants, then it would no longer be a separation of church and state, but a state enforced law over the church which is completely against our constitution.

Im all for gays getting those rights, I have nothing against that.
Im simply saying that I believe the law should add those benefits to a civil union, not to marriage which is Holy to Christians, whether your one or not.

Rmarques 11-08-2007 03:24 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
calling it a civil union, as some have suggested, just leaves it open for denying adoption rights and other rights that you are supposed to get. :(

I'm bisexual, but pretty much just straight. I like women and all but i'm planning on marrying the man i'm with. And i wish so bad that we get a president that takes the stick out of their ass and grants marriage to gays :(.

At least you live in a country that may have it happen soon. Around here, only 29% of the population agrees with gay marriage. >_>

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQQuiddity
Unfortunately they have been enraged that the church doesn't accept their union and write it off as legit, but that's the churches decision not theirs

Actually, they may be enraged because the church doesn't stays out of their bussiness, and encorages people to speak agaisnt we gettign the rights we're denied. Just a thought.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQQuiddity
Im all for gays getting those rights, I have nothing against that.
Im simply saying that I believe the law should add those benefits to a civil union, not to marriage which is Holy to Christians, whether your one or not.

If it's oh-so-holly to Christians, then why don't you complain over other religions and the legal system using the word? I mean, surely, you should also be offended that your cerimony is being lumped together with the cerimonies of heathens.

And answer me this, why should this scenario take place:

Hetero atheist couple goes to the cityhall, signs and piece of paper, and says "We just got married!"

Gay couple goes to the cityhall, signs a piece of paper and says "We just got out civil union!"

It's the same thing, why should we call it a different name?

juno rally 11-08-2007 03:26 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQuiddity
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
I know exactly what you said, which is why i contradicted it. Marriage is not *just* a holy union between a male and a female. Atheists get married and it's not holy. Which brings me back to the first ammendment. Marriage atm is between a man and woman no matter their religion, therefore it is holy for SOME but it is not necessarily holy.

So, madam, you fail. And you show your intelligence by attacking someone just because they disagreed with you


Aren't you just the little hipocritical one.

The Bible states that a union between a man and a woman that do not believe in God is unholy, and that it isn't blessed before God
That's what most churches meet with the couple beforehand so that their marriage can be blessed.

And yes, athiest do get married
But not through the Church, which is what gay couples are wanting.

actually the argument is about gay marrage, in any location be it in a church or not.

and i personally know a few athiests that have been married in a church.

what i really dont understand is why people are so bothered

(edit after reading posts that had been made whilst i made this) sorry i miss understud your meaning!

Kyoko Otonashi 11-08-2007 03:33 PM

Re: Debate: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rmarques
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi
calling it a civil union, as some have suggested, just leaves it open for denying adoption rights and other rights that you are supposed to get. :(

I'm bisexual, but pretty much just straight. I like women and all but i'm planning on marrying the man i'm with. And i wish so bad that we get a president that takes the stick out of their ass and grants marriage to gays :(.

At least you live in a country that may have it happen soon. Around here, only 29% of the population agrees with gay marriage. >_>

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQQuiddity
Unfortunately they have been enraged that the church doesn't accept their union and write it off as legit, but that's the churches decision not theirs

Actually, they may be enraged because the church doesn't stays out of their bussiness, and encorages people to speak agaisnt we gettign the rights we're denied. Just a thought.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToxicQQuiddity
Im all for gays getting those rights, I have nothing against that.
Im simply saying that I believe the law should add those benefits to a civil union, not to marriage which is Holy to Christians, whether your one or not.

If it's oh-so-holly to Christians, then why don't you complain over other religions and the legal system using the word? I mean, surely, you should also be offended that your cerimony is being lumped together with the cerimonies of heathens.

Well fight for it ^^. The world is slowly becoming more accepting of alternative lifestyles. Especially if the United States legalizes gay marriage, many other countries will take suit...as United States is a world power right now.

@juno: i can understand why christians don't want gays to marry in the church, though. It's against religious law to be gay. But i just don't like the thought of not allowing them to marry in the state due to religious law

ToxicQuiddity 11-08-2007 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyoko Otonashi

Oh agreed. the woman i work with annoys me so much. She's always preaching, "Follow the bible. Follow God. If not you're going to hell. Homosexuals should be executed because it is the worst thing you could do! It's revolting." For a woman who is so gung ho on the bible, i wonder if she fails to see the 6 men who aren't her husband that she has had affairs with in the past year. hmmm.


That's just disgusting.
She gives a bad name to Christians everywhere, which in turn pushes others away with the wrong concept of how christians are and the way we behave.

"Homosexuals should be executed"?
She's just plain nuts, you should definitely repress her from your memories.
My mother was the same way when it came to religion
Which is why I considered myself athiest for so many years.
But after having the opportunity to experience what I have, I changed.
It's all recent too~


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.