View Single Post
una
God's own anti-SOB machine.
12907.69
Send a message via MSN to una
una is offline
 
#41
Old 04-18-2010, 02:42 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inertia View Post
But I seriously doubt that you want to have sex with an animal or that you've ever expected an animal to want to have sex with you. So you would have no idea what signals to expect. I've never seen a man give me come to bed eyes, doesn't meant men don't ever want sex from men.
That suggests some sort of foreplay on the animals part. I'm a dog owner and before my dogs got neutered they were particularly fond of legs and cushions but I never saw them eyeing up the cushion or fluttering their lashes at legs. I don't want my hounds to molest my soft furnishings or my guests legs so if there was some sort of give away I would notice it and deter them from their wicked ways.
There are very few animals that have sex for pleasure. Dogs use sex as a way of asserting dominance. I think the humping is more down to impulse then canine lust. I think you try to convey the idea that animal sexuality is universally the same.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Inertia View Post
Yet, the occurrence is fairly commonplace according to research. Restrictions only make people hide, leading to worse circumstances of abuse. With or without you believing it's right or wrong, animals CAN NEVER complain, therefore regardless of any laws or opinions animals CAN always be sexually violated by it's owner repeatedly and it IS powerless to stop it or tell anyone, which makes your statement confusing.
Most people keep their sex lives private. I don't see how making bestiality legal stop people from hiding what they do in the bedroom or how it would lessen abuse. The illegal status and it being a social taboo deters people from doing it like in the day of yore when pre-martial sex was a big taboo. Giving bestiality a legal status will not make the problem better. Animals will become sexual object, the practice of bestiality will increase along with the risk of abuse.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Inertia View Post
Again, I agree with you in believing that it is wrong, but your reasoning is faulty.
There is not going to be a clear cut logical deduction because this is more a less a debate of moral and ethics. When look at certain scenarios with out moral objectivity then they look social acceptable like visiting dying hospital patients while dressed as death or sleeping with dead corpses ect. Hypothetically we could do that but most of us exercise some form of moral decorum which tells us that is tasteles and downright icky :no::gonk::cry: