View Single Post
una
God's own anti-SOB machine.
12907.69
Send a message via MSN to una
una is offline
 
#7
Old 09-09-2011, 04:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anaxilea View Post
It seriously makes me furious that a hospital would try to refuse care to any patient. The legal guardian IS the legal guardian because these choices are his or hers to make. I don't see how they could take a stance that it is ethically wrong to preserve life.

Don't get me wrong - I'm not Christian, but I do believe that life is a very precious thing, and should be taken care of.
The hospital wasn't refusing care. It was refusing to prolong the baby's life with life supporting interventions. The hospital wanted to put the baby on palliative care which is basically stop all life supporting interventions and providing nursing care and pain relief for a dignified pain free death. Doctors have more insight into patient prognosis and what the patient is actually going to have to suffer and endure from the result of their conditions/interventions. The legal guardian has limited concept and the impairment of an emotional attachment. That Baby K, probably suffered a lot because of the choices her mother made, even though they were made out of love. The baby needlessly suffered and it suffered for no good reason, it was never going to get better. I worked in hospital and have seen the complications that arise from ventilators, PEG etc and they are grim. Honestly I wouldn't want to see my child suffer like that if I knew it would not get better. What this baby needed more than anything was mercy and unfortunately that got blindsided by a mother's love and faith.