suppi
sleepyhead
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:25 PM
Noo.. D: xD
|
|
|
|
Fiziali
Fizi, Fizgig, Fizpop, ...(insert...
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:26 PM
Thanks, hehe
|
|
|
|
Peanut
Banned
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:26 PM
- Dx;;
I'm not gonna know any of these am I?
|
|
|
|
Eroy
(^(エ)^)
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
- Dx;;
I'm not gonna know any of these am I?
|
gotta look 'em up. I'm doing that.
|
|
|
|
Suteki
(◎_◎;)
Banned
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
- Dx;;
I'm not gonna know any of these am I?
|
Hah, maybe not this round.
Maybe Wifey will beat Hubby xD
|
|
|
|
Fiziali
Fizi, Fizgig, Fizpop, ...(insert...
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:26 PM
You can use resources to look them up, Peanut :)
|
|
|
|
Sizzla
Gangsta Biatch
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:26 PM
Sorry Suteki. I probably should have been more specific, but the answer I was looking for was Linnaeus. *nods*
And now, moving on to Question 3...
3. Though a tomato is botanically a fruit, what court case says that it is actually a vegetable, and in what year did this case occur?
|
|
|
|
Suteki
(◎_◎;)
Banned
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizzla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizzla
Sorry Suteki. I probably should have been more specific, but the answer I was looking for was Linnaeus. *nods*
And now, moving on to Question 3...
3. Though a tomato is botanically a fruit, what court case says that it is actually a vegetable, and in what year did this case occur?
|
|
1893
EDIT: Also, the case was Nix vs Hedden~
|
|
|
|
Jesmond
(っ◕‿◕)&...
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:27 PM
Nix v. Hedden
Edit: Whoops, forgot year. xP Oh well
1893
|
|
|
|
Eroy
(^(エ)^)
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:28 PM
Salem, New Jersey courthouse 1820
|
|
|
|
Yreka
(っ◕‿◕)&...
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:28 PM
Nix v. Hedden in 1893
|
|
|
|
Phenomenon
\ (•◡•) /
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:28 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court settled this controversy in 1893, declaring that the tomato is a vegetable.
The case is known as Nix v. Hedden (149 U.S. 304).
>> Sorry for edited post.
|
|
|
|
suppi
sleepyhead
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:28 PM
You guys are too fast. >>;
|
|
|
|
Eroy
(^(エ)^)
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:29 PM
Woops I didn't read far enough.. duh.
|
|
|
|
Peanut
Banned
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:29 PM
- BLEH.
By the time I type it in to search, someone answers.
D;
|
|
|
|
Fiziali
Fizi, Fizgig, Fizpop, ...(insert...
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:29 PM
1887. Oh wait, that wasn't it, lol, that was when tariff's were imposed, lol
|
|
|
|
Eroy
(^(エ)^)
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:29 PM
She asked for the case NAME and YEAR guys.
Once we answer once we can't try again correct?
|
|
|
|
suppi
sleepyhead
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
- BLEH.
By the time I type it in to search, someone answers.
D;
|
Same here. xD
|
|
|
|
Eroy
(^(エ)^)
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:30 PM
Nix v. Hedden 1893 (sorry if we can't answer a second time.. someone who hasn't answered can use it)
|
|
|
|
Suteki
(◎_◎;)
Banned
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eroy
She asked for the case NAME and YEAR guys.
Once we answer once we can't try again correct?
|
Yah. I should read closer next time xD
|
|
|
|
suppi
sleepyhead
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:31 PM
Who answered the full question correctly then? ;o
|
|
|
|
Peanut
Banned
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:31 PM
- Eroy:
Right, only 1st answers are accepted.
D;
Nix vs. Hedden, 1893?
xD
|
|
|
|
Eroy
(^(エ)^)
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suteki
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eroy
She asked for the case NAME and YEAR guys.
Once we answer once we can't try again correct?
|
Yah. I should read closer next time xD
|
Me too. I was in a hurry :oops: xDDD
|
|
|
|
Dillo
(^._.^)ノ
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:32 PM
Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893)[
|
|
|
|
Sizzla
Gangsta Biatch
|
|
07-28-2007, 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yreka
Nix v. Hedden in 1893
|
Okay, I had to make a decision on this problem, because I didn't think of it before the event actually started.
I am checking for edited posts. If you do not include all of the information in your first post, whoever answered first without editing will get the point, OR you can post the second part of the answer in a new post, but you may not edit.
So, point goes to Yreka this round!
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) |
|
|
|