Thread Tools

suppi
sleepyhead
483.80
suppi is offline
 
#51
Old 07-28-2007, 07:25 PM

Noo.. D: xD

Fiziali
Fizi, Fizgig, Fizpop, ...(insert...
0.00
Fiziali is offline
 
#52
Old 07-28-2007, 07:26 PM

Thanks, hehe

Peanut
Banned
715.09
Peanut is offline
 
#53
Old 07-28-2007, 07:26 PM

  • Dx;;
    I'm not gonna know any of these am I?

Eroy
(^(エ)^)
107.50
Eroy is offline
 
#54
Old 07-28-2007, 07:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
  • Dx;;
    I'm not gonna know any of these am I?
gotta look 'em up. I'm doing that.

Suteki
(◎_◎;)
Banned
1067.37
Send a message via AIM to Suteki Send a message via MSN to Suteki
Suteki is offline
 
#55
Old 07-28-2007, 07:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
  • Dx;;
    I'm not gonna know any of these am I?
Hah, maybe not this round.

Maybe Wifey will beat Hubby xD

Fiziali
Fizi, Fizgig, Fizpop, ...(insert...
0.00
Fiziali is offline
 
#56
Old 07-28-2007, 07:26 PM

You can use resources to look them up, Peanut :)

Sizzla
Gangsta Biatch
3747.79
Send a message via AIM to Sizzla
Sizzla is offline
 
#57
Old 07-28-2007, 07:26 PM

Sorry Suteki. I probably should have been more specific, but the answer I was looking for was Linnaeus. *nods*

And now, moving on to Question 3...


3. Though a tomato is botanically a fruit, what court case says that it is actually a vegetable, and in what year did this case occur?

Suteki
(◎_◎;)
Banned
1067.37
Send a message via AIM to Suteki Send a message via MSN to Suteki
Suteki is offline
 
#58
Old 07-28-2007, 07:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizzla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizzla
Sorry Suteki. I probably should have been more specific, but the answer I was looking for was Linnaeus. *nods*

And now, moving on to Question 3...


3. Though a tomato is botanically a fruit, what court case says that it is actually a vegetable, and in what year did this case occur?
1893

EDIT: Also, the case was Nix vs Hedden~

Jesmond
(っ◕‿◕)&...
23471.94
Send a message via AIM to Jesmond Send a message via MSN to Jesmond
Jesmond is offline
 
#59
Old 07-28-2007, 07:27 PM

Nix v. Hedden

Edit: Whoops, forgot year. xP Oh well
1893

Eroy
(^(エ)^)
107.50
Eroy is offline
 
#60
Old 07-28-2007, 07:28 PM

Salem, New Jersey courthouse 1820

Yreka
(っ◕‿◕)&...
902.07
Yreka is offline
 
#61
Old 07-28-2007, 07:28 PM

Nix v. Hedden in 1893

Phenomenon
\ (•◡•) /
105.60
Phenomenon is offline
 
#62
Old 07-28-2007, 07:28 PM

The U.S. Supreme Court settled this controversy in 1893, declaring that the tomato is a vegetable.
The case is known as Nix v. Hedden (149 U.S. 304).

>> Sorry for edited post.

suppi
sleepyhead
483.80
suppi is offline
 
#63
Old 07-28-2007, 07:28 PM

You guys are too fast. >>;

Eroy
(^(エ)^)
107.50
Eroy is offline
 
#64
Old 07-28-2007, 07:29 PM

Woops I didn't read far enough.. duh.

Peanut
Banned
715.09
Peanut is offline
 
#65
Old 07-28-2007, 07:29 PM

  • BLEH.
    By the time I type it in to search, someone answers.
    D;

Fiziali
Fizi, Fizgig, Fizpop, ...(insert...
0.00
Fiziali is offline
 
#66
Old 07-28-2007, 07:29 PM

1887. Oh wait, that wasn't it, lol, that was when tariff's were imposed, lol

Eroy
(^(エ)^)
107.50
Eroy is offline
 
#67
Old 07-28-2007, 07:29 PM

She asked for the case NAME and YEAR guys.

Once we answer once we can't try again correct?

suppi
sleepyhead
483.80
suppi is offline
 
#68
Old 07-28-2007, 07:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
  • BLEH.
    By the time I type it in to search, someone answers.
    D;
Same here. xD

Eroy
(^(エ)^)
107.50
Eroy is offline
 
#69
Old 07-28-2007, 07:30 PM

Nix v. Hedden 1893 (sorry if we can't answer a second time.. someone who hasn't answered can use it)

Suteki
(◎_◎;)
Banned
1067.37
Send a message via AIM to Suteki Send a message via MSN to Suteki
Suteki is offline
 
#70
Old 07-28-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eroy
She asked for the case NAME and YEAR guys.

Once we answer once we can't try again correct?
Yah. I should read closer next time xD

suppi
sleepyhead
483.80
suppi is offline
 
#71
Old 07-28-2007, 07:31 PM

Who answered the full question correctly then? ;o

Peanut
Banned
715.09
Peanut is offline
 
#72
Old 07-28-2007, 07:31 PM

  • Eroy:
    Right, only 1st answers are accepted.
    D;


    Nix vs. Hedden, 1893?
    xD

Eroy
(^(エ)^)
107.50
Eroy is offline
 
#73
Old 07-28-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suteki
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eroy
She asked for the case NAME and YEAR guys.

Once we answer once we can't try again correct?
Yah. I should read closer next time xD
Me too. I was in a hurry :oops: xDDD

Dillo
(^._.^)ノ
8.75
Dillo is offline
 
#74
Old 07-28-2007, 07:32 PM

Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893)[

Sizzla
Gangsta Biatch
3747.79
Send a message via AIM to Sizzla
Sizzla is offline
 
#75
Old 07-28-2007, 07:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yreka
Nix v. Hedden in 1893

Okay, I had to make a decision on this problem, because I didn't think of it before the event actually started.

I am checking for edited posts. If you do not include all of the information in your first post, whoever answered first without editing will get the point, OR you can post the second part of the answer in a new post, but you may not edit.

So, point goes to Yreka this round!

 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump

no new posts