Ooh [; Thank you XD

;o I have to get ready to go to school now. I'll check back here later.

Thanks again ^^

Answer: Nonononoooo D: It certainly isn't here
Gender: Female
Age: 16
Location: Scotland

Answer: Yes, for certain, specific crimes
Gender: Female
Age: 25-30 years old
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

Thank you guys ;] More more.

I actually more .. 18+ people but anyone is fine :]

Answer: Undecided
Gender:Female
Age:17
Location:CA

It really depends. I mean I would mostly lean towards yes but only if there were some restrictions to the penalty. Like only for certain hance crimes. Meh, yeah it depends.

Thanks again ;D

More more? <3

Answer: yes
Gender: female
Age: going to be sophmore in college
Location: Hawaii

Answer: YES!!!!!!
Gender: Female
Age: 15
Location: Ohio

Answer: Yes, only in situations were there is no chance for parol and the person admits to what they have done wrong..
Gender: Female
Age: 18
Location: Pennsylvania

Wow. Menewsha's totally dying on me. Probably the shietloads of people on.

Answer - Yes, but only in cases where there's absolutely no question of guilt.
Gender - Female
Age - 25-30
Location - Michigan

Answer: yes
Gender: female
Age: 21
Location:canada

Thank you guys ;] More more ~ <3

Ohmygod, crucial time for flowers ><

Answer: Yes
Gender: Female
Age: 14
Location: Australia. : D

I reckon the families and friends of those who were effected by these people who did crimes to get the death sentence would feel much better if there was no possibility at all that the criminal could do it again. .__.
(and it costs moneys to keep them in cells! XD;)

Undecided
Female
24
Canada

I hate the idea of killing anyone. On the other hand, some specifics of a case may require it. And some people definitely need to be killed-- though I tend to think of this on a dictator/war scale. So it's all complicated. Undecided.

Thank you ;] <3

Answer: Yes--only for rape and murder, DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Examples:
A. A man killing the mass murderer who also happened to kill his wife should NOT be put to death, while the mass murderer should be.
B. An eighteen year old who had sex with his sixteen year old girlfriend should NOT be put to death (they should be, perhaps, talked to about the wisdom of their actions--but not put through that), while a twenty-two year old who made an unwilling thirteen year old have sex with him should be.

Also, it depends on how solid the proof is. (Wouldn't you hate to put someone to death and find out a year later that they were innocent?)
Gender: Female
Age: 18
Location: Michigan

Thanks ;]<3