Thread Tools

ultra kitty girl
Here, we'll ride the surfing lla...
5.62
ultra kitty girl is offline
 
#1
Old 08-12-2009, 04:11 PM

On iCarly one day, they had a random debate about legs and pudding. Is pudding more important? Or are legs more important?

I personally think legs are more important, cause if you didn't have legs how would you get to the computer to play games?

But then again pudding is very delicious and gives people dreams of swimming in it...


Now, it's your opinion I want.

LEGS
OR
PUDDING
?

Xrabbite
CONFUSED
951.49
Xrabbite is offline
 
#2
Old 08-12-2009, 04:25 PM

um.. legs~
Sure you can live without legs, you can live without pudding
But pudding is a snack food. Legs are limbs of your body used to get you from place to place! I'd rather have legs.

Claudia
(っ◕‿◕)&...
113.80
Claudia is offline
 
#3
Old 08-12-2009, 05:49 PM

Are you being serious?....Legs of course.

Lilikka
⊙ω⊙
138.70
Send a message via AIM to Lilikka Send a message via MSN to Lilikka Send a message via Yahoo to Lilikka
Lilikka is offline
 
#4
Old 08-12-2009, 08:07 PM

Maybe this should just be in General Discussion, or perhaps even Media (as it relates to a TV show?).

Either way, it's not really much of a debate. So I guess I'll play devil's advocate and say pudding. I mean, if you had all the pudding you wanted, you wouldn't necessarily need your legs, as it's pretty high in Calories and you'd end up pretty overweight if that's all you ate?

Ugh, OK, that just sounds really gross D:

Miralema
⊙ω⊙
2950.70
Miralema is offline
 
#5
Old 08-12-2009, 09:05 PM

LOL...I watched this episode (I'm a nanny for little kids.) I would personally say legs, but that's because I'm not a huge fan of pudding. But...I would gladly trade my legs for a lifetime supply of beef jerky...but that's just me.

 



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

 
Forum Jump

no new posts